1615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22310080)
1. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Mantry S; Cunliffe I
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
Zhang Y; Bian A; Hang Q; Li L; Zhang S; Cheng G; Zhou Q
Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Costin BR; Fleming GP; Weber PA; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
J Glaucoma; 2014 Feb; 23(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 23603825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgically induced changes in corneal viscoelastic properties after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy using ocular response analyzer.
Seymenoğlu G; Uzun Ö; Başer E
Curr Eye Res; 2013 Jan; 38(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22799272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
