93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22310164)
1. Effects of Bluetooth device electromagnetic field on hearing: pilot study.
Balachandran R; Prepageran N; Rahmat O; Zulkiflee AB; Hufaida KS
J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 22310164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audiologic disturbances in long-term mobile phone users.
Panda NK; Jain R; Bakshi J; Munjal S
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 20122338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of potential effects of the electromagnetic fields of mobile phones on hearing.
Uloziene I; Uloza V; Gradauskiene E; Saferis V
BMC Public Health; 2005 Apr; 5():39. PubMed ID: 15840162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of chronic exposure to cellular telephone electromagnetic fields on hearing in rats.
Kayabasoglu G; Sezen OS; Eraslan G; Aydin E; Coskuner T; Unver S
J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Apr; 125(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 21059276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma.
Büchler M; Kompis M; Hotz MA
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1315-22. PubMed ID: 22931865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory changes in mobile users: is evidence forthcoming?
Panda NK; Modi R; Munjal S; Virk RS
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Apr; 144(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 21493239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions after intratympanic gentamicin therapy for unilateral Ménière's disease.
Perez N; Boleas MS; Martin E
Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 15650298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields exposure on cochlear cells' functionality in rats: evaluation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Galloni P; Lovisolo GA; Mancini S; Parazzini M; Pinto R; Piscitelli M; Ravazzani P; Marino C
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Oct; 26(7):536-47. PubMed ID: 16037958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results for audiology and distortion product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Karabulut H; Dagli M; Ates A; Karaaslan Y
J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Feb; 124(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 19852869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.
Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function.
Krause E; Mayerhofer A; Gürkov R; Drexl M; Braun T; Olzowy B; Boetzel K
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23921920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of treatment with vincristine on transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Riga M; Psarommatis I; Korres S; Lyra Ch; Papadeas E; Varvutsi M; Ferekidis E; Apostolopoulos N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1003-8. PubMed ID: 16359737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of UMTS cellular phones on human hearing: results of the European project EMFnEAR.
Parazzini M; Sibella F; Lutman ME; Mishra S; Moulin A; Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Woznicka E; Politanski P; Zmyslony M; Thuroczy G; Molnár F; Kubinyi G; Tavartkiladze G; Bronyakin S; Uloziene I; Uloza V; Gradauskiene E; Ravazzani P
Radiat Res; 2009 Aug; 172(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 19630529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
Fetterman BL
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Bluetooth headset and mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human auditory nerve.
Mandalà M; Colletti V; Sacchetto L; Manganotti P; Ramat S; Marcocci A; Colletti L
Laryngoscope; 2014 Jan; 124(1):255-9. PubMed ID: 23619813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
