These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22310415)

  • 21. [Polished stem displacement from a cement mantle--a case report].
    Blacha J
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2004; 69(6):417-8. PubMed ID: 15913030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Closed reduction of a dislocated constrained total hip arthroplasty using a novel technique with a PEG board.
    Flint JH; Phisitkul P; Callaghan JJ
    Orthopedics; 2010 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 20349877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high dislocation: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of previous reports.
    Hartofilakidis G; Karachalios T; Georgiades G; Kourlaba G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):1614-8. PubMed ID: 21915576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.
    Sah AP; Estok DM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 18310700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
    Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure?
    Carter AH; Sheehan EC; Mortazavi SM; Purtill JJ; Sharkey PF; Parvizi J
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):46-52. PubMed ID: 21550768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-Term Outcomes of Liner Cementation into a Stable Retained Shell: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report.
    Tan TL; Le Duff MJ; Ebramzadeh E; Bhaurla SK; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jun; 97(11):920-4. PubMed ID: 26041853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
    von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
    Goto K; Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Morimoto T; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18669955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
    Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation.
    Wegrzyn J; Thoreson AR; Guyen O; Lewallen DG; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Jun; 31(6):991-7. PubMed ID: 23335343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimum 20-year follow-up results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
    Trumm BN; Callaghan JJ; George CA; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 23759117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.
    Xará-Leite F; Pereira AD; Andrade R; Sarmento A; Sousa R; Ayeni OR; Espregueira-Mendes J; Soares D
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 32666308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 'Rail road' proximal femoral osteotomy: a new technique to remove well-fixed femoral stem or cement mantle in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Piyakunmala K; Sangkomkamhang T; Chareonchonvanitch K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S152-5. PubMed ID: 20120678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Total hip arthroplasty: to cement or not to cement the acetabular socket? A critical review of the literature.
    Clement ND; Biant LC; Breusch SJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Mar; 132(3):411-27. PubMed ID: 22134618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Constrained Acetabular Liners.
    Jones SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29525341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constrained acetabular liners cemented into cages during total hip revision arthroplasty.
    Khoury JI; Malkani AL; Adler EM; Markel DC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 20620017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.