These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22311738)

  • 1. Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model.
    Taylor AB; MacKinnon DP
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):806-44. PubMed ID: 22311738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An SAS/IML procedure for maximum likelihood factor analysis.
    Chen R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 12834089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo based statistical power analysis for mediation models: methods and software.
    Zhang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1184-98. PubMed ID: 24338601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.
    Lunneborg CE
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?
    Hayes AF; Scharkow M
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1918-27. PubMed ID: 23955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation.
    Tofighi D; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):188-210. PubMed ID: 31179751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for variability in the use of permutation testing to detect quantitative trait loci.
    Nettleton D; Doerge RW
    Biometrics; 2000 Mar; 56(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10783776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Permutation Distancing Test for dependent single-case observational AB-phase design data: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Vroegindeweij A; Nijhof LN; Onghena P; van de Putte EM; Nijhof SL; Houtveen J
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 37528291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: some simulation results.
    Tambour M; Zethraeus N
    Health Econ; 1998 Mar; 7(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 9565170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Confidence Interval for the Difference Between Standardized Regression Coefficients.
    Anderson SF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(4):758-780. PubMed ID: 38560991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-sided nonparametric tests for ordinal data.
    Neuhäuser M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):510-4. PubMed ID: 16383087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Faster permutation inference in brain imaging.
    Winkler AM; Ridgway GR; Douaud G; Nichols TE; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():502-516. PubMed ID: 27288322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals for distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions in multiple regression.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 25844629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.
    Rotello CM; Masson ME; Verde MF
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 18372758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble confidence intervals for binomial proportions.
    Park H; Leemis LM
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3460-3475. PubMed ID: 31099897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.