532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2231229)
1. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. I. Optimal selection of teeth for periodontal bone loss surveys.
Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Province M; Vahey EP
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):618-22. PubMed ID: 2231228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What alveolar crest level on a bite-wing radiograph represents bone loss?
Hausmann E; Allen K; Clerehugh V
J Periodontol; 1991 Sep; 62(9):570-2. PubMed ID: 1941497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ROC analysis of observer-response subjective rating data--application to periodontal radiograph assessment.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Mar; 84(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 2024718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs.
Hausmann E; Allen K; Carpio L; Christersson LA; Clerehugh V
J Periodontol; 1992 Aug; 63(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 1507045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital radiographic image-based bone level measurements: effect of film density.
Shrout MK; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Ahmed NM
J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Sep; 20(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 8408722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of alignment errors on bitewing-based bone loss measurements.
Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Oct; 18(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 1960240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems.
Scaf G; Sakakura CE; Kalil PF; Dearo de Morais JA; Loffredo LC; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 17082333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters.
Eickholz P; Riess T; Lenhard M; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 May; 26(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 10355620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study.
Li G; Engström PE; Nasström K; Lü ZY; Sanderink G; Welander U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17329581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A six-site method for the evaluation of periodontal bone loss in cone-beam CT images.
Guo YJ; Ge ZP; Ma RH; Hou JX; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150265. PubMed ID: 26509657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement accuracy of marginal bone level in digital radiographs with and without color coding.
Li G; Engström PE; Welander U
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Oct; 65(5):254-8. PubMed ID: 18092199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
