213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22312843)
1. [Robot assisted laparoscopic staging of endometrial cancer--comparison with standard laparotomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Táborská S; Dzvincuk P
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Dec; 76(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 22312843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.
Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
Mourits MJ; Bijen CB; Arts HJ; ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Paulsen L; Wijma J; Bongers MY; Post WJ; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 20638901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.
Devaja O; Samara I; Papadopoulos AJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 20686375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
