These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22313277)

  • 1. Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser- and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems.
    Oskoee PA; Kimyai S; Ebrahimi Chaharom ME; Rikhtegaran S; Pournaghi-Azar F
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 22313277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of various grit burs on marginal integrity of resin composite restorations.
    Nishimura K; Ikeda M; Yoshikawa T; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 2005 Mar; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15868736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations.
    Ergin E; Oz FD; Gurgan S
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Acid Etching on Long-term Microleakage of Nano Ionomer Restorations in Burand Laser-prepared Cavities in Primary Teeth.
    Shafiei F; Memarpour M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2015; 82(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 25909836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.