These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22313819)

  • 1. A quadrant tray and bite registration as an alternative to dual-arch impressions for fixed prosthetics: a clinical and dental laboratory technique.
    Hammond BD; Myers ML; Haywood VB
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 22313819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An easy technique to obtain articulated casts using the palate for the interocclusal record.
    Rodrigues DM; Fernandes FH; Orsi IA; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):245-6. PubMed ID: 20180899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions.
    Kaplowitz GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Feb; 127(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 8682993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single step approach to make diagnostic impressions of both the arches and face bow transfer: a novel technique.
    Komuravelli AK; Suresh Sajjan MC
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 22842240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A survey on the utilization of disposable quadrant articulators.
    Thornton LJ
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 12029803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jaw relation records for fixed prosthodontics.
    Squier RS
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vii, 471-86. PubMed ID: 15172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The corrected cast impression: an alternative technique.
    Walton JN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):779-81. PubMed ID: 20830890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques.
    Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hughbanks JC; Reid DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 9297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The platform interocclusal registration technique.
    Lee MW; Baum L
    Gen Dent; 1993; 41(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 8262345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acrylic resin transfer coping technique for making accurate interocclusal records.
    Antonelli J; Hottel TL; Siegel SC; Darnell L
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):17-21; quiz 22-3. PubMed ID: 21748975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the accuracy of two articulating methods: the double-arch impression technique vs. hand-articulated full-arch casts.
    Gregory WA; Kaplan MD
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Sep; 19(9):631-4. PubMed ID: 3077689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II.
    Kaplowitz GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Sep; 128(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 9297950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An interocclusal record--impression-axis frame.
    Getz EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Feb; 41(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 366113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
    Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.