300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22314919)
1. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
Snapp H; Angeli S; Telischi FF; Fabry D
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of preoperative hearing-in-noise protocol for osseointegrated hearing implants.
Whited CW; Unrein SC; Tucci DL; Kaylie DM
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 23820797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-anchored implantation for single-sided deafness in patients with less than profound hearing loss.
Zeitler DM; Snapp HA; Telischi FF; Angeli SI
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 22368043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Yuen HW; Bodmer D; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants.
Snapp HA; Holt FD; Liu X; Rajguru SM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.
Linstrom CJ; Silverman CA; Yu GP
Laryngoscope; 2009 Apr; 119(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 19266579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Baha system in patients with single-sided deafness and contralateral hearing loss.
Wazen JJ; Van Ess MJ; Alameda J; Ortega C; Modisett M; Pinsky K
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Apr; 142(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 20304277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term benefit and sound localization in patients with single-sided deafness rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-conduction device.
Saroul N; Akkari M; Pavier Y; Gilain L; Mom T
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 23202156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implant.
Sylvester DC; Gardner R; Reilly PG; Rankin K; Raine CH
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):922-6. PubMed ID: 23370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term safety and benefit of a new intraoral device for single-sided deafness.
Murray M; Miller R; Hujoel P; Popelka GR
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1262-9. PubMed ID: 21799455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone conductive implants in single-sided deafness.
Monini S; Musy I; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 135(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 25720582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
