283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22316650)
1. Correlation of corneal elevation with severity of keratoconus by means of anterior and posterior topographic analysis.
Ishii R; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Utsumi Y; Kumanomido T
Cornea; 2012 Mar; 31(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 22316650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.
Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes.
Schlegel Z; Hoang-Xuan T; Gatinel D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):789-95. PubMed ID: 18471634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of Pentacam and OrbscanII systems for the diagnosis of keratoconus suspects].
DU XL; Chen M; Ma L; Wang XX; Xie LX
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 48(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 22800453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus.
Piñero DP; Alió JL; Alesón A; Escaf Vergara M; Miranda M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 20457375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles.
Bühren J; Kook D; Yoon G; Kohnen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3424-32. PubMed ID: 20164452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of corneal volume from anterior topography and topographic pachymetry: application to healthy and keratoconic eyes.
Cerviño A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Ferrer-Blasco T; Garcia-Resua C; Montes-Mico R; Parafita M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 19821928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus.
Demir S; Ortak H; Yeter V; Alim S; Sayn O; Taş U; Sönmez B
Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus using posterior elevation measured with 2 different methods.
de Sanctis U; Aragno V; Dalmasso P; Brusasco L; Grignolo F
Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):911-5. PubMed ID: 23572130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Subclinical keratoconus diagnosis by elevation topography].
Arntz A; Durán JA; Pijoán JI
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Dec; 78(12):659-64. PubMed ID: 14689322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus.
Nakagawa T; Maeda N; Kosaki R; Hori Y; Inoue T; Saika M; Mihashi T; Fujikado T; Tano Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2660-5. PubMed ID: 19029032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes.
Fam HB; Lim KL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1281-7. PubMed ID: 16863962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes.
Quisling S; Sjoberg S; Zimmerman B; Goins K; Sutphin J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1629-32. PubMed ID: 16949447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
