These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22316755)

  • 1. A polynomial equation to predict low back compression force: accounting for the effects of load height on instability.
    Calder IC; Potvin JR
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():388-93. PubMed ID: 22316755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constraining spine stability levels in an optimization model leads to the prediction of trunk muscle cocontraction and improved spine compression force estimates.
    Brown SH; Potvin JR
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 15713295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of backpack load on critical changes of trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine loading during walking.
    Li SSW; Chow DHK
    Ergonomics; 2018 Apr; 61(4):553-565. PubMed ID: 28791922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological considerations for the calculation of cumulative compression exposure of the lumbar spine: a sensitivity analysis on joint model and time standardization approaches.
    Fischer SL; Albert WJ; McClellan AJ; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2007 Sep; 50(9):1365-76. PubMed ID: 17654030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a stiff lifting belt on spine compression during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Suwarganda EK; Bruijnen TB; Peters RJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):E833-9. PubMed ID: 17047531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there a low-back cost to hip-centric exercise? Quantifying the lumbar spine joint compression and shear forces during movements used to overload the hips.
    Frost DM; Beach T; Fenwick C; Callaghan J; McGill S
    J Sports Sci; 2012 May; 30(9):859-70. PubMed ID: 22468799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of compressive forces on lumbar spine from categorical posture data.
    Tak S; Punnett L; Paquet V; Woskie S; Buchholz B
    Ergonomics; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2082-94. PubMed ID: 17852375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of prediction models for the compression force on the lumbosacral disc.
    Kee D; Chung MK
    Ergonomics; 1996 Dec; 39(12):1419-29. PubMed ID: 8969128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression.
    Zhang QH; Zhou YL; Petit D; Teo EC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 19038569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.