119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22316876)
1. Developing an usability test to evaluate the use of augmented reality to improve the first interaction with a product.
Albertazzi D; Okimoto ML; Ferreira MG
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1160-3. PubMed ID: 22316876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of augmented reality in the usability evaluation of products.
Faust F; Roepke G; Catecati T; Araujo F; Ferreira MG; Albertazzi D
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1164-7. PubMed ID: 22316877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usability engineering for augmented reality: employing user-based studies to inform design.
Gabbard JL; Swan JE
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 18369261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TURF: toward a unified framework of EHR usability.
Zhang J; Walji MF
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):1056-67. PubMed ID: 21867774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed reality humans: evaluating behavior, usability, and acceptability.
Kotranza A; Lok B; Deladisma A; Pugh CM; Lind DS
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2009; 15(3):369-82. PubMed ID: 19282545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms.
Freire LL; Arezes PM; Campos JC
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1038-44. PubMed ID: 22316857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmented reality: a review.
Berryman DR
Med Ref Serv Q; 2012; 31(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 22559183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of the efficacy of collaborative virtual reality systems for moderated remote usability testing.
Chalil Madathil K; Greenstein JS
Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():501-514. PubMed ID: 28256209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative usability studies of full vs. partial immersive virtual reality simulation for medical education and training.
Pierce J; Gutiérrez F; Vergara VM; Alverson DC; Qualls C; Saland L; Goldsmith T; Caudell TP
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():372-7. PubMed ID: 18391324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game.
McMahan RP; Bowman DA; Zielinski DJ; Brady RB
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):626-33. PubMed ID: 22402690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing two anesthesia information management system user interfaces: a usability evaluation.
Wanderer JP; Rao AV; Rothwell SH; Ehrenfeld JM
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23055030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The contribution of apparent and inherent usability to a user's satisfaction in a searching and browsing task on the Web.
Fu L; Salvendy G
Ergonomics; 2002 May; 45(6):415-24. PubMed ID: 12061966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the iterative development of VR/AR human factors tools for manual work.
Liston PM; Kay A; Cromie S; Leva C; D'Cruz M; Patel H; Langley A; Sharples S; Aromaa S
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2208-15. PubMed ID: 22317043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?
Botden SM; Jakimowicz JJ
Surg Endosc; 2009 Aug; 23(8):1693-700. PubMed ID: 18813987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification and prioritization of usability problems using an augmented classification scheme.
Khajouei R; Peute LW; Hasman A; Jaspers MW
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):948-57. PubMed ID: 21782036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying usability methods to identify health literacy issues: an example using a Personal Health Record.
Monkman H; Kushniruk A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():179-85. PubMed ID: 23388278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hands-free interaction in immersive virtual reality: A systematic review.
Monteiro P; Goncalves G; Coelho H; Melo M; Bessa M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 May; 27(5):2702-2713. PubMed ID: 33750693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures.
Sonderegger A; Sauer J
Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1350-61. PubMed ID: 19851903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The virtual anatomy laboratory: usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education.
Doubleday EG; O'Loughlin VD; Doubleday AF
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 21830309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
