BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22317361)

  • 1. Does team lifting increase the variability in peak lumbar compression in ironworkers?
    Faber G; Visser S; van der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Hoozemans MJ; Van Dieën JH; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4171-3. PubMed ID: 22317361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar compression forces while lifting and carrying with two and four workers.
    Visser S; Faber GS; Hoozemans MJ; van der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Frings-Dresen MH; van Dieën JH
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():56-61. PubMed ID: 25959318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers.
    van der Molen HF; Visser S; Kuijer PP; Faber G; Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3771-3. PubMed ID: 22317295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk factors for lower back injury in male dancers performing ballet lifts.
    Alderson J; Hopper L; Elliott B; Ackland T
    J Dance Med Sci; 2009; 13(3):83-9. PubMed ID: 19754984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ratio of thoracic to lumbar compression force is posture dependent.
    Lee PJ; Lee EL; Hayes WC
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(5):832-41. PubMed ID: 23510145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying interactive effects of task demands in lifting on estimates of in vivo low back joint loads.
    Gooyers CE; Beach TAC; Frost DM; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():203-210. PubMed ID: 29122191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within-subject variability in low back load in a repetitively performed, mildly constrained lifting task.
    van Dieën JH; Dekkers JJ; Groen V; Toussaint HM; Meijer OG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(16):1799-804. PubMed ID: 11493854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lift performance and lumbar loading in standing and seated lifts.
    Middleton KJ; Carstairs GL; Ham DJ
    Ergonomics; 2016 Sep; 59(9):1242-50. PubMed ID: 26772388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loads on the lumbar spine during a work capacity assessment test.
    Cole MH; Grimshaw PN; Burden AM
    Work; 2004; 23(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 15502297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.
    Dennis GJ; Barrett RS
    Ergonomics; 2002 Aug; 45(10):671-81. PubMed ID: 12437851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of ship motion on spinal loading during manual lifting.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Delleman NJ; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1426-40. PubMed ID: 18802823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative analysis of lumbar spine mechanics during barbell- and crate-lifting: implications for occupational lifting task assessments.
    Zehr JD; Carnegie DR; Welsh TN; Beach TAC
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Mar; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29436289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study.
    Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.