These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22317367)

  • 1. Using naturalistic driving films as a design tool for investigating driver requirements in HMI design for ADAS.
    Wang M; Sun D; Chen F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4205-12. PubMed ID: 22317367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using naturalistic driving films as a design tool for investigating driver requirements in HMI design for ADAS.
    Wang M; Sun D; Chen F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5045-52. PubMed ID: 22317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How shall we design the future vehicle for Chinese market.
    Chen F; Wang M; Zhu XC; Li J
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4265-72. PubMed ID: 22317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to investigate drivers' acceptance of Blind Spot Detection System®.
    Piccinini G; Simões A; Rodrigues CM; Leitão M
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4213-7. PubMed ID: 22317368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Requirements of a system to reduce car-to-vulnerable road user crashes in urban intersections.
    Habibovic A; Davidsson J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1570-80. PubMed ID: 21545892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward best practice in Human Machine Interface design for older drivers: A review of current design guidelines.
    Young KL; Koppel S; Charlton JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():460-467. PubMed ID: 27374247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of information quantity and display formats on driving behaviors in a connected vehicle environment.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Quddus M; Huang H; Zhao X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107621. PubMed ID: 38729056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: a pilot study on the right turn manoeuvre.
    van Nes N; Christoph M; Hoedemaeker M; van der Horst RA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():318-29. PubMed ID: 23915473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the reliability of the occlusion technique as a tool for the assessment of the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems.
    Gelau C; Henning MJ; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 18550026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver behavior in car-to-pedestrian incidents: An application of the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM).
    Habibovic A; Tivesten E; Uchida N; Bärgman J; Ljung Aust M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():554-65. PubMed ID: 22749319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of directional speech warnings on road hazard detection.
    Serrano J; Di Stasi LL; Megías A; Catena A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 22133340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automotive HMI design and participatory user involvement: review and perspectives.
    François M; Osiurak F; Fort A; Crave P; Navarro J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):541-552. PubMed ID: 27167154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis.
    Wang J; Huang H; Li Y; Zhou H; Liu J; Xu Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105680. PubMed ID: 32707185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is naturalistic driving research possible with highly instrumented cars? Lessons learnt in three research centres.
    Valero-Mora PM; Tontsch A; Welsh R; Morris A; Reed S; Touliou K; Margaritis D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():187-94. PubMed ID: 23332021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of affective interaction design in car user interfaces.
    Gkouskos D; Chen F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5057-61. PubMed ID: 22317504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?
    Ackermann C; Beggiato M; Schubert S; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():272-282. PubMed ID: 30509537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems.
    Staubach M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):1025-33. PubMed ID: 19664441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.