226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22317792)
1. Indicators of sediment and biotic mercury contamination in a southern New England estuary.
Taylor DL; Linehan JC; Murray DW; Prell WL
Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Apr; 64(4):807-19. PubMed ID: 22317792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury content of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) from southern New England coastal habitats: Contamination in an emergent fishery and risks to human consumers.
Taylor DL; Calabrese NM
Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Jan; 126():166-178. PubMed ID: 29421084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of a submerged meadow on uptake and trophic transfer of legacy mercury from contaminated sediment in the food web in a brackish Norwegian fjord.
Olsen M; Fjeld E; Lydersen E
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():209-217. PubMed ID: 30445322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution and availability of mercury and methylmercury in different waters from the Rio Madeira Basin, Amazon.
Vieira M; Bernardi JVE; Dórea JG; Rocha BCP; Ribeiro R; Zara LF
Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():771-779. PubMed ID: 29351888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota.
Jonsson S; Skyllberg U; Nilsson MB; Lundberg E; Andersson A; Björn E
Nat Commun; 2014 Aug; 5():4624. PubMed ID: 25140406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a mercury speciation, fate, and biotic uptake (BIOTRANSPEC) model: application to Lahontan Reservoir (Nevada, USA).
Gandhi N; Bhavsar SP; Diamond ML; Kuwabara JS; Marvin-Dipasquale M; Krabbenhoft DP
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2007 Nov; 26(11):2260-73. PubMed ID: 17941724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercury distribution and methylmercury mobility in the sediments of three sites on the Lebanese coast, eastern Mediterranean.
Abi-Ghanem C; Nakhlé K; Khalaf G; Cossa D
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 60(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 20625711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments.
Gilmour CC; Riedel GS; Riedel G; Kwon S; Landis R; Brown SS; Menzie CA; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 47(22):13001-10. PubMed ID: 24156748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Net methylmercury production in 2 contrasting stream sediments and associated accumulation and toxicity to periphyton.
Klaus JE; Hammerschmidt CR; Costello DM; Burton GA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1759-65. PubMed ID: 26636557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mercury concentrations at a historically mercury-contaminated site in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa).
Williams CR; Leaner JJ; Somerset VS; Nel JM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 18(7):1079-89. PubMed ID: 21318285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury and methylmercury bioaccumulation by polychaete worms is governed by both feeding ecology and mercury bioavailability in coastal mudflats.
Sizmur T; Canário J; Gerwing TG; Mallory ML; O'Driscoll NJ
Environ Pollut; 2013 May; 176():18-25. PubMed ID: 23395989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sediment organic carbon and temperature effects on methylmercury concentration: A mesocosm experiment.
Buckman KL; Seelen EA; Mason RP; Balcom P; Taylor VF; Ward JE; Chen CY
Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 666():1316-1326. PubMed ID: 30970496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different circulation history of mercury in aquatic biota from King George Island of the Antarctic.
Liu H; Yu B; Fu J; Li Y; Yang R; Zhang Q; Liang Y; Yin Y; Hu L; Shi J; Jiang G
Environ Pollut; 2019 Jul; 250():892-897. PubMed ID: 31085475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mercury and its form in a dammed reservoir ecosystem during the charging phase.
Mir Y; Wu S; Ma M; Mangwandi C; Mirza ZA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):37099-37113. PubMed ID: 32577982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing methylmercury contamination of black bass from California reservoirs.
Melwani AR; Negrey J; Heim WA; Coale KH; Stephenson MD; Davis JA
Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():850-861. PubMed ID: 31125815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mercury isotope variations within the marine food web of Chinese Bohai Sea: Implications for mercury sources and biogeochemical cycling.
Meng M; Sun RY; Liu HW; Yu B; Yin YG; Hu LG; Chen JB; Shi JB; Jiang GB
J Hazard Mater; 2020 Feb; 384():121379. PubMed ID: 31611019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of aquaculture on mercury distribution, changing speciation, and bioaccumulation in a reservoir ecosystem.
Liang P; Feng X; You Q; Gao X; Xu J; Wong M; Christie P; Wu SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(33):25923-25932. PubMed ID: 28940142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Net methylmercury production as a basis for improved risk assessment of mercury-contaminated sediments.
Skyllberg U; Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Karlsson T; Johnson T; Heinemo SA; Holmström H
Ambio; 2007 Sep; 36(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 17985697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecology and environmental characteristics influence methylmercury bioaccumulation in coastal invertebrates.
Bradford MA; Mallory ML; O'Driscoll NJ
Chemosphere; 2024 Jan; 346():140502. PubMed ID: 37866498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organic material: the primary control on mercury methylation and ambient methyl mercury concentrations in estuarine sediments.
Lambertsson L; Nilsson M
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):1822-9. PubMed ID: 16570603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
