BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22318477)

  • 1. Unsupervised segmentation and quantification of anatomical knee features: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
    Tamez-Peña JG; Farber J; González PC; Schreyer E; Schneider E; Totterman S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1177-86. PubMed ID: 22318477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knee cartilage: efficient and reproducible segmentation on high-spatial-resolution MR images with the semiautomated graph-cut algorithm method.
    Shim H; Chang S; Tao C; Wang JH; Kwoh CK; Bae KT
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):548-56. PubMed ID: 19401579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images.
    Dodin P; Pelletier JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Abram F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 20639173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Segmenting articular cartilage automatically using a voxel classification approach.
    Folkesson J; Dam EB; Olsen OF; Pettersen PC; Christiansen C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jan; 26(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 17243589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated techniques for visualization and mapping of articular cartilage in MR images of the osteoarthritic knee: a base technique for the assessment of microdamage and submicro damage.
    Cashman PM; Kitney RI; Gariba MA; Carter ME
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2002 Mar; 1(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 16689221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model.
    Kauffmann C; Gravel P; Godbout B; Gravel A; Beaudoin G; Raynauld JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Pelletier JP; de Guise JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):978-88. PubMed ID: 12892325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femorotibial cartilage morphology: reproducibility of different metrics and femoral regions, and sensitivity to change in disease.
    Hudelmaier M; Wirth W; Wehr B; Kraus V; Wyman BT; Hellio Le Graverand MP; Eckstein F
    Cells Tissues Organs; 2010; 192(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 20606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactive knee cartilage extraction using efficient segmentation software: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.
    Gan HS; Tan TS; Wong LX; Tham WK; Sayuti KA; Abdul Karim AH; bin Abdul Kadir MR
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3145-57. PubMed ID: 25227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance image segmentation using semi-automated software for quantification of knee articular cartilage---initial evaluation of a technique for paired scans.
    Brem MH; Lang PK; Neumann G; Schlechtweg PM; Schneider E; Jackson R; Yu J; Eaton CB; Hennig FF; Yoshioka H; Pappas G; Duryea J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2009 May; 38(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19252907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis and prognosis of tibial cartilage loss by quantification of tibia trabecular bone from MRI.
    Marques J; Genant HK; Lillholm M; Dam EB
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Aug; 70(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 22941674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage thickness based on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wirth W; Eckstein F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 18541481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee.
    Buck RJ; Wyman BT; Le Graverand MP; Wirth W; Eckstein F;
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):680-90. PubMed ID: 20187178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.
    Graichen H; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Vogl T; Englmeier KH; Eckstein F
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Mar; 50(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 15022323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of 3D-MR image registration to monitor diseases around the knee joint.
    Takao M; Sugano N; Nishii T; Miki H; Koyama T; Masumoto J; Sato Y; Tamura S; Yoshikawa H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):656-60. PubMed ID: 16215970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.
    Eckstein F; Buck RJ; Burstein D; Charles HC; Crim J; Hudelmaier M; Hunter DJ; Hutchins G; Jackson C; Kraus VB; Lane NE; Link TM; Majumdar LS; Mazzuca S; Prasad PV; Schnitzer TJ; Taljanovic MS; Vaz A; Wyman B; Le Graverand MP;
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Dec; 67(12):1683-8. PubMed ID: 18283054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated segmentation and analysis of normal and osteoarthritic knee menisci from magnetic resonance images--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
    Paproki A; Engstrom C; Chandra SS; Neubert A; Fripp J; Crozier S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 Sep; 22(9):1259-70. PubMed ID: 25014660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scan-rescan precision of subchondral bone curvature maps from routine 3D DESS water excitation sequences: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
    Farber JM; Totterman SM; Martinez-Torteya A; Tamez-Peña JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Feb; 69():83-91. PubMed ID: 26751403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of unwrapped phase in MR image segmentation: a preliminary study.
    Bourgeat P; Fripp J; Janke A; Galloway G; Crozier S; Ourselin S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):813-20. PubMed ID: 16686035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies.
    Zhang K; Lu W; Marziliano P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 31(10):1731-43. PubMed ID: 23867282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic quantification of tibio-femoral contact area and congruity.
    Tummala S; Nielsen M; Lillholm M; Christiansen C; Dam EB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 31(7):1404-12. PubMed ID: 22481812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.