439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320149)
21. Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model.
Widiger TA; Trull TJ
Am Psychol; 2007; 62(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 17324033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five Factor Model personality disorder scales: An introduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five factor model.
Bagby RM; Widiger TA
Psychol Assess; 2018 Jan; 30(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29323509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The central domains of personality pathology in psychiatric patients.
Mulder RT; Newton-Howes G; Crawford MJ; Tyrer PJ
J Pers Disord; 2011 Jun; 25(3):364-77. PubMed ID: 21699397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Disorder.
Widiger TA
J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 26010493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using a general model of personality to understand sex differences in the personality disorders.
Lynam DR; Widiger TA
J Pers Disord; 2007 Dec; 21(6):583-602. PubMed ID: 18072861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the FFM PD count technique for screening personality pathology in later middle-aged and older adults.
Van den Broeck J; Rossi G; De Clercq B; Dierckx E; Bastiaansen L
Aging Ment Health; 2013; 17(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 22913535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Beyond dysfunction and threshold-based classification: a multidimensional model of personality disorder diagnosis.
Bornstein RF; Huprich SK
J Pers Disord; 2011 Jun; 25(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 21699395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Categorical versus dimensional classification of personality disorders: are dimensional models the future?].
Barnow S; Herpertz S; Spitzer C; Dudeck M; Grabe HJ; Freyberger HJ
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2006 Dec; 74(12):706-13. PubMed ID: 17167729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The representation of four personality disorders by the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality dimensional model of personality.
Morey LC; Warner MB; Shea MT; Gunderson JG; Sanislow CA; Grilo C; Skodol AE; McGlashan TH
Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 14593832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maladaptive variants of conscientiousness and agreeableness.
Samuel DB; Gore WL
J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1669-96. PubMed ID: 22321159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A shaky future for personality disorders.
Widiger TA
Personal Disord; 2011 Jan; 2(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 22448690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinician's judgments of the utility of the DSM-IV and five-factor models for personality disordered patients.
Mullins-Sweatt SN; Widiger TA
J Pers Disord; 2011 Aug; 25(4):463-77. PubMed ID: 21838562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground.
Widiger TA; Simonsen E
J Pers Disord; 2005 Apr; 19(2):110-30. PubMed ID: 15899712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinician ratings of the five-factor model of personality and the DSM-IV personality disorders.
Blais MA
J Nerv Ment Dis; 1997 Jun; 185(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 9205425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The DSM-5 dimensional model of personality disorder: rationale and empirical support.
Widiger TA
J Pers Disord; 2011 Apr; 25(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 21466251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Personality and personality disorders II. The Specificity of the DAPP-model as a diagnostic system for personality disorders].
Steinmeyer EM; Klosterkötter J; Möller HJ; Sass H; Herpertz S; Czernik A; Marcea JT; Matakas F; Mehne J; Bottländer H; Hesse W; Steinbring I; Pukrop R
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2002 Dec; 70(12):641-6. PubMed ID: 12459945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Personality in DSM-5: helping delineate personality disorder content and framing the metastructure.
Krueger RF; Eaton NR; Derringer J; Markon KE; Watson D; Skodol AE
J Pers Assess; 2011 Jul; 93(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 22804671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contributions from personality- and psychodynamically oriented assessment to the development of the DSM-5 personality disorders.
Huprich SK
J Pers Assess; 2011 Jul; 93(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 22804674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: the case for experiential permeability.
Piedmont RL; Sherman MF; Sherman NC; Dy-Liacco GS; Williams JE
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1245-58. PubMed ID: 19469599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing personality disorder models: cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR.
Samuel DB; Widiger TW
J Pers Disord; 2010 Dec; 24(6):721-45. PubMed ID: 21158596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
