These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320665)

  • 1. Sodium metabisulfite as a contact allergen--an example of a rare chemical mechanism for protein modification.
    Roberts DW; Basketter D; Kimber I; White J; McFadden J; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 22320665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sodium metabisulfite--a marker for cosmetic allergy?
    Malik MM; Hegarty MA; Bourke JF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Apr; 56(4):241-2. PubMed ID: 17343630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contact allergy to sodium sulfite and its relationship to sodium metabisulfite.
    Oliphant T; Mitra A; Wilkinson M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):128-30. PubMed ID: 22320666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sulfite contact allergy.
    Vena GA; Foti C; Angelini G
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 7821011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from sodium metabisulfite.
    Sasseville D; El-Helou T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):244-5. PubMed ID: 19825102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
    Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro and in vivo analysis of pro- and anti-inflammatory effects of weak and strong contact allergens.
    Lass C; Merfort I; Martin SF
    Exp Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 19(11):1007-13. PubMed ID: 20701630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
    Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sodium metabisulfite - a contact allergen?
    Aalto-Korte K; Suuronen K; Alanko K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 19207389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophilic reaction chemistry of low molecular weight respiratory sensitizers.
    Enoch SJ; Roberts DW; Cronin MT
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1447-53. PubMed ID: 19610608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers.
    Basketter D; Maxwell G
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):359-73. PubMed ID: 18058309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sodium metabisulfite--a contact allergen?
    Madan V; Beck MH
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jul; 61(1):58. PubMed ID: 19659972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
    Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What determines skin sensitization potency-myths, maybes and realities. Part 1. The 500 molecular weight cut-off.
    Roberts DW; Mekenyan OG; Dimitrov SD; Dimitrova GD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Jan; 68(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 22924443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Mugita N; Hirota M; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 21767275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allergic contact dermatitis due to sodium metabisulfite in a bleaching cream.
    Huang PY; Chu CY
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 17244094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of topical exposure to chemical allergens on murine Langerhans cells. Comparison of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene with trimellitic anhydride.
    Cumberbatch M; Gould SJ; Peters SW; Basketter DA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    J Clin Lab Immunol; 1992; 37(2):65-81. PubMed ID: 1340505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.
    Divkovic M; Pease CK; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):189-200. PubMed ID: 16191014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.