BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320667)

  • 21. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland--a multicentre study.
    Hasan T; Rantanen T; Alanko K; Harvima RJ; Jolanki R; Kalimo K; Lahti A; Lammintausta K; Lauerma AI; Laukkanen A; Luukkaala T; Riekki R; Turjanmaa K; Varjonen E; Vuorela AM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15982231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
    Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Majantol.
    Herro E; Jacob SE
    Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
    Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How to test for fragrance allergy.
    Larsen WG
    Cutis; 2000 Jan; 65(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 10664875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fragrance mix I patch test reactions in 5006 consecutive dermatitis patients tested simultaneously with TRUE Test® and Trolab® test material.
    Mortz CG; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):248-53. PubMed ID: 20946453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cosmetic dermatitis in Chinese eczema patients patch tested with a modified European standard series of allergens.
    Wang WH; Li LF; Lu XY; Wang J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 16364117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
    Trattner A; David M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Association between positive patch tests to epoxy resin and fragrance mix I ingredients.
    Andersen KE; Christensen LP; Vølund A; Johansen JD; Paulsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 19260913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multicentre patch testing with fragrance mix II and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Lindberg M; Matura M; Möller H; Stenberg B; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 24588374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy.
    Wöhrl S; Hemmer W; Focke M; Götz M; Jarisch R
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 11531790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries--results of the IVDK*, 1998-2002.
    Uter W; Balzer C; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 16191021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Macro-video documentation patch tests.
    Schuster C; Kränke B; Szolar-Platzer C; Aberer W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15859988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrances.
    Reeder MJ
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 32475515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.