340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320667)
41. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012.
Frosch PJ; Duus Johansen J; Schuttelaar ML; Silvestre JF; Sánchez-Pérez J; Weisshaar E; Uter W;
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Sep; 73(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 26080686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Use of consumer product ingredients for patch testing.
Guin JD
Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 16(2):71-7, quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 16036116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.
Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione.
Kanerva L; Estlander T; Alanko K; Jolanki R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 11244135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?
Ada S; Seçkin D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1192-6. PubMed ID: 20236197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Contact eczema and allergens: an analysis of the preliminary results of patch tests in the Dermatology Service of the National Hospital and University Center in Cotonou].
Yedomon HG; Fayomi EB; Do Ango Padonou F; Zohoun T
Odontostomatol Trop; 1998 Jun; 21(81):19-23. PubMed ID: 11372117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients.
Schnuch A; Kelterer D; Bauer A; Schuster Ch; Aberer W; Mahler V; Katzer K; Rakoski J; Jappe U; Krautheim A; Bircher A; Koch P; Worm M; Löffler H; Hillen U; Frosch PJ; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 15859992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [How common is fragrance allergy really?].
Geier J; Brans R
Hautarzt; 2020 Mar; 71(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 31965209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde.
Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Matura M; Stenberg B; Möller H; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jul; 65(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21595700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Nov; 71(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 25231568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Patch testing in children with hand eczema. A 5-year multicentre study in Spain.
Toledo F; García-Bravo B; Fernández-Redondo V; De la Cuadra J; Giménez-Arnau AM; Borrego L; Carrascosa JM; Armario-Hita JC; Sánchez-Pedreño P; Hervella M; González R; Silvestre JF
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 21702757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Patch-testing with fragrance mix II.
Pónyai G; Németh I; Temesvári E
Dermatitis; 2011 May; 22(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 21569749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005.
White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens.
Matura M; Sköld M; Börje A; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch P; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Svedman C; White IR; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):320-8. PubMed ID: 15932583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as allergen: experience from a contact dermatitis unit.
Carvalho R; Maio P; Amaro C; Santos R; Cardoso J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 21345163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
