214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320669)
1. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens with a standard screening tray of 28 allergens.
Patel D; Belsito DV
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 22320669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.
Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.
Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing with a standard allergen ("screening") tray: rewards and risks.
Belsito DV
Dermatol Ther; 2004; 17(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 15186369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.
Moustafa M; Holden CR; Athavale P; Cork MJ; Messenger AG; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
Keir J; English J; Fergie N
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.
Bilcha KD; Ayele A; Shibeshi D; Lovell C
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 20690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
