664 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320782)
1. Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: seed orientation and the impact of dosimetric anisotropy in stranded implants.
Chng N; Spadinger I; Rasoda R; Morris WJ; Salcudean S
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 22320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the effect of seed orientation in postplanning dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Collins Fekete CA; Plamondon M; Martin AG; Vigneault É; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101704. PubMed ID: 25281943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants.
Chibani O; Williamson JF; Todor D
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2557-66. PubMed ID: 16193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo investigation of I-125 interseed attenuation for standard and thinner seeds in prostate brachytherapy with phantom validation using a MOSFET.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Henry A; Thwaites D
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031717. PubMed ID: 23464312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison between model 9011 and 6711 sources in prostate implants.
Zhang H; Beyer D
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 23510715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: a comparison of suture-embedded and loose seed implants.
Spadinger I; Hilts M; Keyes M; Smith C; Sidhu S; Morris WJ
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 16864068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postimplant Dosimetry of Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy: Comparison of MRI-Only and CT-MRI Fusion-Based Workflows.
Nosrati R; Wronski M; Tseng CL; Chung H; Pejović-Milić A; Morton G; Stanisz GJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Jan; 106(1):206-215. PubMed ID: 31627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo study of LDR seed dosimetry with an application in a clinical brachytherapy breast implant.
Furstoss C; Reniers B; Bertrand MJ; Poon E; Carrier JF; Keller BM; Pignol JP; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1848-58. PubMed ID: 19544804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
