These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320789)

  • 1. Technical note: spatial resolution of proton tomography: impact of air gap between patient and detector.
    Schneider U; Besserer J; Hartmann M
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):798-800. PubMed ID: 22320789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial resolution of proton tomography: Methods, initial phase space and object thickness.
    Schneider U; Pedroni E; Hartmann M; Besserer J; Lomax T
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 22(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 21782400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of the effect of air gap size on the spatial resolution in proton- and helium radio- and tomography.
    Radonic S; Hälg RA; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 32(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 32505460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A maximum likelihood method for high resolution proton radiography/proton CT.
    Collins-Fekete CA; Brousmiche S; Portillo SK; Beaulieu L; Seco J
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8232-8248. PubMed ID: 27811399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental demonstration of a new type of proton computed tomography using a novel silicon tracking detector.
    Taylor JT; Poludniowski G; Price T; Waltham C; Allport PP; Casse GL; Esposito M; Evans PM; Green S; Manger S; Manolopoulos S; Nieto-Camero J; Parker DJ; Symons J; Allinson NM
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6129. PubMed ID: 27806609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.
    Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved proton computed tomography by dual modality image reconstruction.
    Hansen DC; Petersen JB; Bassler N; Sørensen TS
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031904. PubMed ID: 24593722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive theoretical comparison of proton imaging set-ups in terms of spatial resolution.
    Krah N; Khellaf F; Létang JM; Rit S; Rinaldi I
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135013. PubMed ID: 29864022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography.
    Schulte RW; Penfold SN; Tafas JT; Schubert KE
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4849-56. PubMed ID: 19070218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The optimal balance between quality and efficiency in proton radiography imaging technique at various proton beam energies: A Monte Carlo study.
    Biegun AK; van Goethem MJ; van der Graaf ER; van Beuzekom M; Koffeman EN; Nakaji T; Takatsu J; Visser J; Brandenburg S
    Phys Med; 2017 Sep; 41():141-146. PubMed ID: 28869137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple Coulomb scattering and spatial resolution in proton radiography.
    Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1657-63. PubMed ID: 7891624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the modulation transfer function (MTF) of proton/carbon radiography using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Seco J; Oumano M; Depauw N; Dias MF; Teixeira RP; Spadea MF
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091717. PubMed ID: 24007150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity study of proton radiography and comparison with kV and MV x-ray imaging using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations.
    Depauw N; Seco J
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2407-21. PubMed ID: 21427482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Density and spatial resolutions of proton radiography using a range modulation technique.
    Ryu H; Song E; Lee J; Kim J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5461-8. PubMed ID: 18765893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First proton radiography of an animal patient.
    Schneider U; Besserer J; Pemler P; Dellert M; Moosburger M; Pedroni E; Kaser-Hotz B
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1046-51. PubMed ID: 15191291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proton range verification using a range probe: definition of concept and initial analysis.
    Mumot M; Algranati C; Hartmann M; Schippers JM; Hug E; Lomax AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4771-82. PubMed ID: 20679697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proof of principle study of the use of a CMOS active pixel sensor for proton radiography.
    Seco J; Depauw N
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):622-3. PubMed ID: 21452699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pencil beam approach to proton computed tomography.
    Rescigno R; Bopp C; Rousseau M; Brasse D
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6610-24. PubMed ID: 26520752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filtered back-projection reconstruction for attenuation proton CT along most likely paths.
    Quiñones CT; Létang JM; Rit S
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3258-78. PubMed ID: 27032330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comprehensive study of the most likely path formalism for proton-computed tomography.
    Erdelyi B
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6095-122. PubMed ID: 19779216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.