BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320820)

  • 1. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
    Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
    Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
    Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
    Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
    Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.
    Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5435-43. PubMed ID: 26328992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coverage-based treatment planning: optimizing the IMRT PTV to meet a CTV coverage criterion.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):961-73. PubMed ID: 19378757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.
    Chang Y; Xiao F; Quan H; Yang Z
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):241. PubMed ID: 33069253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.
    Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1018-27. PubMed ID: 21452739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
    Song W; Dunscombe P
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer.
    Yagihashi T; Inoue K; Nagata H; Yamanaka M; Yamano A; Suzuki S; Yamakabe W; Sato N; Omura M; Inoue T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e13881. PubMed ID: 36576418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of planning margin on dosimetric quality in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy.
    Li T; Fountain BL; Duffy EW
    Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 19853535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
    Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy.
    Killoran JH; Kooy HM; Gladstone DJ; Welte FJ; Beard CJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 9054898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
    Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable planning margin approach to account for locoregional variations in setup uncertainties.
    Yang J; Garden AS; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Dong L
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5136-44. PubMed ID: 22894439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.