207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22320899)
1. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.
Orvieto MA; Alsikafi NF; Shalhav AL; Laven BA; Steinberg GD; Zagaja GP; Brendler CB
BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 17125478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet 1995-2011 - an analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Røder MA
Dan Med J; 2013 Dec; 60(12):B4752. PubMed ID: 24355454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence.
Røder MA; Kawa S; Scheike T; Toft BG; Hansen JB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 109(8):818-22. PubMed ID: 24522971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy.
Moore BM; Savdie R; PeBenito RA; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Delprado W; Rasiah KK; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21711436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors.
Barré C; Thoulouzan M; Aillet G; Nguyen JM
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):522-31. PubMed ID: 24112703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
