These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22321456)

  • 1. The perceptual span during foveally-demanding visual target localization.
    Greene HH; Simpson D; Bennion J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 22321456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J; McCarley JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
    Benoni H; Tsal Y
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: a dead zone for the global effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Jean A; Farioli F
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4684-708. PubMed ID: 17049960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlling the spotlight of attention: visual span size and flexibility in schizophrenia.
    Elahipanah A; Christensen BK; Reingold EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3370-6. PubMed ID: 21871907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movements and reading in macular disease: further support for the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis.
    Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):590-7. PubMed ID: 16005930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.
    Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.
    Tsal Y; Benoni H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing.
    Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U
    Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of multidimensional targets in visual search.
    Monnier P
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4083-90. PubMed ID: 17007899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced visual processing capacity in sleep deprived persons.
    Kong D; Soon CS; Chee MW
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(2):629-34. PubMed ID: 21195190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load manipulation reveals sensitivity of the face-selective N170 to attention.
    Mohamed TN; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 19369907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder.
    Remington A; Swettenham J; Campbell R; Coleman M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1388-93. PubMed ID: 19843262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.