These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22321628)
1. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology]. Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone]. Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Ludlow JB; Ivanovic M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18504152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging. Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Chau AC; Fung K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region. Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Multi-slice Spiral Computed Tomography Bone Density Measurements in the Maxilla and Mandible. Doyle S; Wiltz MJ; Kraut RA N Y State Dent J; 2015; 81(4):42-5. PubMed ID: 26373034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions. Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner. Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography. Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners]. Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters. Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]