266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22322503)
21. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images.
Toma AM; Zhurov A; Playle R; Ong E; Richmond S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19154273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ruellas AC; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Gomes MR; Danesi C; Lione R; Nguyen T; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 27021458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
