These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22323061)

  • 1. White bear everywhere: exploring the boundaries of the attentional white bear phenomenon.
    Lahav A; Makovski T; Tsal Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):661-73. PubMed ID: 22323061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
    Tsal Y; Makovski T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allocating attention to distractor locations is based on top-down expectations.
    Lahav A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1873-80. PubMed ID: 23425450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?
    Munneke J; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 18589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2489-501. PubMed ID: 21901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: a role for visuospatial attention.
    Remillard G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):528-41. PubMed ID: 19271864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration.
    Schoenherr JR; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 20139451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related differences in the attentional white bear.
    Ashinoff BK; Tsal Y; Mevorach C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1870-1888. PubMed ID: 31183745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sounds change four-dot masking.
    Vroomen J; Keetels M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19012870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preparatory attention: experiment and theory.
    LaBerge D; Auclair L; Sieroff E
    Conscious Cogn; 2000 Sep; 9(3):396-434. PubMed ID: 10993667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consolidation of statistical information of multiple objects in working memory.
    Baijal S; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1733-41. PubMed ID: 21607816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 19429953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.