202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22323073)
1. Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results.
Bledsoe MJ; Grizzle WE; Clark BJ; Zeps N
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 22323073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International normative perspectives on the return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks.
Zawati MH; Knoppers BM
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):484-9. PubMed ID: 22344229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.
Bledsoe MJ; Clayton EW; McGuire AL; Grizzle WE; O'Rourke PP; Zeps N
Genet Med; 2013 Feb; 15(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 22935716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Secondary researchers' duties to return incidental findings and individual research results: a partial-entrustment account.
Richardson HS; Cho MK
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 22361900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mapping the inputs, analyses, and outputs of biobank research systems to identify sources of incidental findings and individual research results for potential return to participants.
Bemmels HR; Wolf SM; Van Ness B
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 22382801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking aims seriously: repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings.
Ossorio P
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 22402758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.
Clayton EW; McGuire AL
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 22323070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project.
Biesecker LG
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 22344227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Wolf SM; Crock BN; Van Ness B; Lawrenz F; Kahn JP; Beskow LM; Cho MK; Christman MF; Green RC; Hall R; Illes J; Keane M; Knoppers BM; Koenig BA; Kohane IS; Leroy B; Maschke KJ; McGeveran W; Ossorio P; Parker LS; Petersen GM; Richardson HS; Scott JA; Terry SF; Wilfond BS; Wolf WA
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):361-84. PubMed ID: 22436882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical examination of the management of return of individual research results and incidental findings in genomic biobanks.
Johnson G; Lawrenz F; Thao M
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 22361899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.
Beskow LM; Burke W; Fullerton SM; Sharp RR
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 22261761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?
Fisher R
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 22361901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intersection of biobanking and clinical care: should discrepant diagnoses and pathological findings be returned to research participants?
Lockhart NC; Yassin R; Weil CJ; Compton CC
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 22344228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?
Miller FG; Mello MM; Joffe S
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):271-9, 211. PubMed ID: 18547194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking.
Meslin EM
Public Health Genomics; 2010; 13(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 20395689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
Fullerton SM; Wolf WA; Brothers KB; Clayton EW; Crawford DC; Denny JC; Greenland P; Koenig BA; Leppig KA; Lindor NM; McCarty CA; McGuire AL; McPeek Hinz ER; Mirel DB; Ramos EM; Ritchie MD; Smith ME; Waudby CJ; Burke W; Jarvik GP
Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 22361898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biobanks and the return of results to donors].
Vermeulen E; Boeckhout M; Zielhuis GA; Bakker R; Janssens AC; Schmidt MK
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158(5):A6653. PubMed ID: 24472337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stewardship practices of U.S. biobanks.
Henderson GE; Edwards TP; Cadigan RJ; Davis AM; Zimmer C; Conlon I; Weiner BJ
Sci Transl Med; 2013 Dec; 5(215):215cm7. PubMed ID: 24337477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent: its history, meaning, and present challenges.
Beauchamp TL
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Oct; 20(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 21843382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.
Fleming J; Critchley C; Otlowski M; Stewart C; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2015 Dec; 45(12):1274-9. PubMed ID: 26390363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
