These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22323094)
1. Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study. Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Bradburn E; Giggens R; Chan DC; Stalder C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 22323094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery. Bhatia A; Palacio M; Wright AM; Yeo GSH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 34254386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Zosmer N; Fuller J; Shaikh H; Johns J; Ross JA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 25586877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caesarean Section Scar and Placental Location at the First Trimester of Pregnancy-A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Savukyne E; Kliucinskas M; Malakauskiene L; Berskiene K Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Apr; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Placental implantation and migration following a previous caesarean section scar. Pirjani R; Seifmanesh F; Tehranian A; Hosseini L; Heidari R; Ghajar A; Sepidarkish M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):115-117. PubMed ID: 27861702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Van Huffel S; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1489-96. PubMed ID: 23585560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the route of delivery in women with low-lying placenta using transvaginal ultrasonography: significance of placental migration and marginal sinus. Ohira S; Kikuchi N; Kobara H; Osada R; Ashida T; Kanai M; Shiozawa T Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 22378482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the presence of a uterine scar influence the site of placental implantation? Carbillon L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):121. PubMed ID: 23798550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus in the first trimester is associated with placental and umbilical cord abnormalities. Hasegawa J; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Otsuki K; Sekizawa A; Farina A; Okai T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 16858739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior placental location influences onset and progress of labor and postpartum outcome. Torricelli M; Vannuccini S; Moncini I; Cannoni A; Voltolini C; Conti N; Di Tommaso M; Severi FM; Petraglia F Placenta; 2015 Apr; 36(4):463-6. PubMed ID: 25573094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section. Kamel R; Eissa T; Sharaf M; Negm S; Thilaganathan B Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):466-470. PubMed ID: 32330331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of transverse fundal incision method of cesarean section for women with placentas widely covering the entire anterior uterine wall. Nishida R; Yamada T; Akaishi R; Kojima T; Ishikawa S; Takeda M; Morikawa M; Yamada T; Minakami H J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 22690852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study. Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in Cesarean section scar dimensions during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 23108803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for morbidly adherent placenta in early pregnancy. Panaiotova J; Tokunaka M; Krajewska K; Zosmer N; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):101-106. PubMed ID: 30199114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relevance of placental location at 20-23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Becker RH; Vonk R; Mende BC; Ragosch V; Entezami M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 17(6):496-501. PubMed ID: 11422970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Features of the pathogenesis of the placenta growing in the scar after cesarean section]. Barinova IV; Kondrikov NI; Voloshchuk IN; Chechneva MA; Shchukina NA; Petrukhin VA Arkh Patol; 2018; 80(2):18-23. PubMed ID: 29697667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]