163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22323685)
1. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.
Spencer JM; Chauhan SK; Sloan K; Taylor A; Beaver RJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17463115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial.
Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Petursson G; Hallan G; Strøm E; Dyrhovden G; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 24788494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Khan MM; Khan MW; Al-Harbi HH; Weening BS; Zalzal PK
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21704485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 21675934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery.
Kalairajah Y; Simpson D; Cossey AJ; Verrall GM; Spriggins AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Nov; 87(11):1480-2. PubMed ID: 16260662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.
Zhang GQ; Chen JY; Chai W; Liu M; Wang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1190-6. PubMed ID: 21776571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Weng YJ; Hsu RW; Hsu WH
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):668-73. PubMed ID: 18534395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
Seon JK; Song EK
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve.
Smith BR; Deakin AH; Baines J; Picard F
Comput Aided Surg; 2010; 15(1-3):40-8. PubMed ID: 20500099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional results of navigated minimally invasive and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a comparison in bilateral cases.
Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S145-7. PubMed ID: 17407943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes.
Hamel MB; Toth M; Legedza A; Rosen MP
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 168(13):1430-40. PubMed ID: 18625924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system.
Dalury DF; Mason JB; Murphy JA; Adams MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 19258612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
