233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22323689)
1. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus.
Dawson J; Doll H; Coffey J; Jenkinson C;
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Aug; 15(8):918-31. PubMed ID: 17383907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 24709030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome Assessment Performance of the SF-36, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and AOFAS in Forefoot Reconstruction Surgery.
Adames DNB; González-Lucena G; Ruales JIS; Cudos BG; Ginés-Cespedosa A
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(2):248-252. PubMed ID: 34364761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of Euroqol EQ-5D and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire scores six months following podiatric surgery.
Maher AJ; Kilmartin TE
J Foot Ankle Res; 2012 Jul; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 22776703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with patient satisfaction with foot and ankle surgery in a large prospective study.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp RJ; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
Foot (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 22(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 22681897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus.
Dawson J; Coffey J; Doll H; Lavis G; Cooke P; Herron M; Jenkinson C
Qual Life Res; 2006 Sep; 15(7):1211-22. PubMed ID: 17001437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative prospective cohort health economic analysis comparing ankle fusion, isolated great toe fusion and hallux valgus surgery.
Loveday DT; Barr LV; Loizou CL; Barton G; Smith G
Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Feb; 24(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 29413775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the EQ-5D-5L a responsive test to evaluate results in elective foot and ankle surgery?
Ginés-Cespedosa A; Cuellar D; Villaroel C; Fontanellas A; Gonzalez-Lucena G; Bianco D; Gamba C; Ledermann G
Foot Ankle Surg; 2023 Jun; 29(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 37173173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS).
Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Good responsiveness with EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire and Short Form (36) Health Survey in 20-69 years old patients with a femoral neck fracture: A 2-year prospective follow-up study in 182 patients.
Honkavaara N; Al-Ani AN; Campenfeldt P; Ekström W; Hedström M
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1692-7. PubMed ID: 27282691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
