1224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22324801)
1. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion improves 2-year pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with adjacent segment disease: defining the long-term effectiveness of surgery.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 22381277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?
Copay AG; Cher DJ
Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 26245709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.
Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Canan CE; Burke LO; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 23157276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
