238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22324812)
1. What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication.
Skarlatidou A; Cheng T; Haklay M
Risk Anal; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1496-511. PubMed ID: 22324812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility.
Chung JB; Kim HK; Rho SK
Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1021-32. PubMed ID: 18627537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The crucial role of nomothetic and idiographic conceptions of time: interdisciplinary collaboration in nuclear waste management.
Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P; Scholz RW
Risk Anal; 2012 Jan; 32(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 21651596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population.
Perko T
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():86-91. PubMed ID: 23683940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters.
Seidl R; Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P
Risk Anal; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1038-48. PubMed ID: 23020311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Injury prevention and risk communication: a mental models approach.
Austin LC; Fischhoff B
Inj Prev; 2012 Apr; 18(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22088928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project.
Drew CH; Nyerges TL; Leschine TM
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1641-64. PubMed ID: 15660618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of public-interest group positions on radiation protection.
Florig HK
Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 17033464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent trends and developments in dialogue on radioactive waste management: experience from the UK.
Kemp RV; Bennett DG; White MJ
Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16844222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions.
Roeser S
Risk Anal; 2012 Jun; 32(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 22519693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different concepts of risk -- a challenge for risk communication.
Hampel J
Int J Med Microbiol; 2006 May; 296 Suppl 40():5-10. PubMed ID: 16524781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tale taming radioactive fears: Linking nuclear waste disposal to the "continuum of the good".
Yli-Kauhaluoma S; Hänninen H
Public Underst Sci; 2014 Apr; 23(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 24113741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resolving public conflict in site selection process-a risk communication approach.
Ishizaka K; Tanaka M
Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 12893010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative risk assessment of the New York State operated West Valley Radioactive Waste Disposal Area.
Garrick BJ; Stetkar JW; Bembia PJ
Risk Anal; 2010 Aug; 30(8):1219-30. PubMed ID: 20412517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reactor-based management of used nuclear fuel: assessment of major options.
Finck PJ; Wigeland RA; Hill RN
Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21399411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When the facts are just not enough: credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is short.
Reynolds BJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 21034761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries.
Perko T; Zeleznik N; Turcanu C; Thijssen P
Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):614-25. PubMed ID: 22570920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-informed radioactive waste classification and reclassification.
Croff AG
Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):449-60. PubMed ID: 17033455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
