These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22324812)

  • 1. What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication.
    Skarlatidou A; Cheng T; Haklay M
    Risk Anal; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1496-511. PubMed ID: 22324812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility.
    Chung JB; Kim HK; Rho SK
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1021-32. PubMed ID: 18627537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The crucial role of nomothetic and idiographic conceptions of time: interdisciplinary collaboration in nuclear waste management.
    Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P; Scholz RW
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jan; 32(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 21651596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population.
    Perko T
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():86-91. PubMed ID: 23683940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters.
    Seidl R; Moser C; Stauffacher M; Krütli P
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1038-48. PubMed ID: 23020311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Injury prevention and risk communication: a mental models approach.
    Austin LC; Fischhoff B
    Inj Prev; 2012 Apr; 18(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 22088928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project.
    Drew CH; Nyerges TL; Leschine TM
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1641-64. PubMed ID: 15660618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of public-interest group positions on radiation protection.
    Florig HK
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 17033464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent trends and developments in dialogue on radioactive waste management: experience from the UK.
    Kemp RV; Bennett DG; White MJ
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16844222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions.
    Roeser S
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jun; 32(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 22519693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different concepts of risk -- a challenge for risk communication.
    Hampel J
    Int J Med Microbiol; 2006 May; 296 Suppl 40():5-10. PubMed ID: 16524781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tale taming radioactive fears: Linking nuclear waste disposal to the "continuum of the good".
    Yli-Kauhaluoma S; Hänninen H
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Apr; 23(3):316-30. PubMed ID: 24113741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving public conflict in site selection process-a risk communication approach.
    Ishizaka K; Tanaka M
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(5):385-96. PubMed ID: 12893010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative risk assessment of the New York State operated West Valley Radioactive Waste Disposal Area.
    Garrick BJ; Stetkar JW; Bembia PJ
    Risk Anal; 2010 Aug; 30(8):1219-30. PubMed ID: 20412517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reactor-based management of used nuclear fuel: assessment of major options.
    Finck PJ; Wigeland RA; Hill RN
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21399411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When the facts are just not enough: credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is short.
    Reynolds BJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 21034761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is knowledge important? Empirical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries.
    Perko T; Zeleznik N; Turcanu C; Thijssen P
    Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):614-25. PubMed ID: 22570920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk-informed radioactive waste classification and reclassification.
    Croff AG
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):449-60. PubMed ID: 17033455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.