131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22324968)
1. Directly measured mucosal pressures produced by the i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Kaufmann M; Keller C; Tiefenthaler W
Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 22324968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.
Ragazzi R; Finessi L; Farinelli I; Alvisi R; Volta CA
Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 22329593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M
Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures, airway sealing pressures, and fiberoptic position with the intubating versus the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesthesiology; 1999 Apr; 90(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 10201670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Sep; 83(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 10655926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Chang E; Langen KE; Anderson K
Anaesthesia; 2012 Feb; 67(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 22070630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P
Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers.
Russo SG; Cremer S; Eich C; Jipp M; Cohnen J; Strack M; Quintel M; Mohr A
Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 23015619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients.
Donaldson W; Abraham A; Deighan M; Michalek P
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Jun; 155(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21804625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of a cervical collar on the seal pressure of the LMA Supreme™: a prospective, crossover trial.
Mann V; Spitzner T; Schwandner T; Mann ST; Müller M; Ahlbrandt J; Weigand MA; Röhrig R
Anaesthesia; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1260-5. PubMed ID: 22881293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
