233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22325838)
1. Incremental cost-effectiveness of the pre- and post-bevacizumab eras of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy in British Columbia, Canada.
Hedden L; Kennecke H; Villa D; Johnston K; Speers C; Kovacic L; Renouf DJ; Peacock S
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(13):1969-76. PubMed ID: 22325838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Goulart B; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):836-45. PubMed ID: 21914503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-utility analysis of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a Markov model.
Patel JJ; Mendes MA; Bounthavong M; Christopher ML; Boggie D; Morreale AP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 20846318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of antiangiogenesis therapy using bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.
Minion LE; Bai J; Monk BJ; Robin Keller L; Ramez EN; Forde GK; Chan JK; Tewari KS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):490-6. PubMed ID: 25766118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival for metastatic colorectal cancer in the bevacizumab era: a population-based analysis.
Renouf DJ; Lim HJ; Speers C; Villa D; Gill S; Blanke CD; O'Reilly SE; Kennecke H
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2011 Jun; 10(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 21859560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and cost effectiveness of bevacizumab + FOLFIRI combination versus FOLFIRI alone as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in South Korea.
Lee EK; Revil C; Ngoh CA; Lister J; Kwon JM; Park MH; Park SJ; Park YS; Shin SJ; Lee MA; Lee NS; Zang DY; Bae EJ; Kang MJ
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1408-19. PubMed ID: 22657254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Healthcare costs associated with bevacizumab and cetuximab in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Yang H; Yu AP; Wu EQ; Yim YM; Yu E
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 21728912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Markov model assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX compared with FOLFIRI for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tumeh JW; Shenoy PJ; Moore SG; Kauh J; Flowers C
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Feb; 32(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 19194125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Kovic B; Xie F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(20):2296-302. PubMed ID: 26014296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Whyte S; Pandor A; Stevenson M; Rees A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(Suppl. 2):47-53. PubMed ID: 21047491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
