These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Biomechanical evaluation of anatomical double-bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction secured with knot fixation versus screw fixation. Staron JS; Esquivel AO; Pandhi NG; Hanna JD; Lemos SE Orthopedics; 2013 Aug; 36(8):e1047-52. PubMed ID: 23937752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation. Wellmann M; Kempka JP; Schanz S; Zantop T; Waizy H; Raschke MJ; Petersen W Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2009 May; 17(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 19225755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts with and without coracoacromial ligament transfer. Clevenger T; Vance RE; Bachus KN; Burks RT; Tashjian RZ Arthroscopy; 2011 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20950988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Shin SJ; Campbell S; Scott J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Sep; 22(9):2216-22. PubMed ID: 23842800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Biomechanical Analysis of Different Clavicular Tunnel Diameters in Anatomic Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction. Voss A; Beitzel K; Alaee F; Dukas A; Herbst E; Obopilwe E; Apostolakos J; DiVenere J; Singh H; Cote MP; Mazzocca AD Arthroscopy; 2016 Aug; 32(8):1551-7. PubMed ID: 27180922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Single- Versus Double-Tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Stabilization for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Banffy MB; Uquillas C; Neumann JA; ElAttrache NS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Apr; 46(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 29438625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of tendon suturing on the interference fixation strength of quadrupled hamstring tendon grafts. Höher J; Offerhaus C; Steenlage E; Weiler A; Scheffler S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Sep; 133(9):1309-14. PubMed ID: 23836318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of distal clavicle excision on in situ graft forces in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Kowalsky MS; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo KF; McHugh MP; Nicholas SJ; Lee SJ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2313-9. PubMed ID: 20699427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of patellar fixation techniques in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Russ SD; Tompkins M; Nuckley D; Macalena J Am J Sports Med; 2015 Jan; 43(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 25261087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acromioclavicular joint stabilization with a double cow-hitch technique compared to a double tight-rope: a biomechanical study. Borbas P; Angelella D; Laux CJ; Bachmann E; Ernstbrunner L; Bouaicha S; Wieser K Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Jul; 142(7):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 33479838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hybrid femoral fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the EndoButton CL and bioabsorbable interference screws: a biomechanical study. Oh YH; Namkoong S; Strauss EJ; Ishak C; Hecker AT; Jazrawi LM; Rosen J Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1218-24. PubMed ID: 17084300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of three patellar fixation techniques for MPFL reconstruction: Load to failure did not differ but interference screw stabilization was stiffer than suture anchor and suture-knot fixation. Raoulis VA; Zibis A; Chiotelli MD; Kermanidis AT; Banios K; Schuster P; Hantes ME Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Nov; 29(11):3697-3705. PubMed ID: 33386885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro study comparing titanium, poly-d,l-lactide, and poly-d,l-lactide-tricalcium phosphate screws. Zantop T; Weimann A; Schmidtko R; Herbort M; Raschke MJ; Petersen W Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1204-10. PubMed ID: 17084298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tibial fixation comparison of semitendinosus-bone composite allografts fixed with bioabsorbable screws and bone-patella tendon-bone grafts fixed with titanium screws. Kocabey Y; Klein S; Nyland J; Caborn D Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Mar; 12(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12845425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertical and Rotational Stiffness of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study of 3 Different Techniques. Celik H; Chauhan A; Flores-Hernandez C; Dorthe E; Goodine T; D'Lima D; Hoenecke H Arthroscopy; 2020 May; 36(5):1264-1270. PubMed ID: 32035171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Apostolakos J; Cote MP; Russell RP; Charette R; Singh H; Arciero RA; Imhoff AB; Mazzocca AD Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2141-8. PubMed ID: 24989491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Testing of Three Alternative Quadrupled Tendon Graft Constructs With Adjustable Loop Suspensory Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With Four-Strand Grafts Fixed With Screws and Femoral Fixed Loop Devices. Vertullo CJ; Piepenbrink M; Smith PA; Wilson AJ; Wijdicks CA Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):828-836. PubMed ID: 30789779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioabsorbable screw fixation in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Talbert TW; Green JR; Mukherjee DP; Ogden AL; Mayeux RH J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 14649570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]