202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22326590)
1. Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.
Hughes ML; Castioni EE; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL
Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):46-57. PubMed ID: 22326590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of neural adaptation and degeneration on pulse-train ECAPs: A model study.
van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():167-178. PubMed ID: 30947041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.
Bournique JL; Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 23303197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Riggs WJ; Carter BL; Xie R
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Skidmore J; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y; He S
Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37194125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.
Rubinstein JT; Wilson BS; Finley CC; Abbas PJ
Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):108-18. PubMed ID: 9925022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fast, stochastic, and adaptive model of auditory nerve responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Kalkman RK; Frijns JHM
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():130-143. PubMed ID: 27594099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
Tian Y; Li W; Wang Z; Yang N; Hui L; Jiang X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
