These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22327413)

  • 1. The impact of magnification on occlusal caries diagnosis with implementation of the ICDAS II criteria.
    Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 22327413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
    Jablonski-Momeni A; Stachniss V; Ricketts DN; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 18204251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of different magnification levels on visual caries detection with ICDAS.
    Neuhaus KW; Jost F; Perrin P; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 26366524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reproducibility of ICDAS II in primary teeth.
    Shoaib L; Deery C; Ricketts DN; Nugent ZJ
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 19907175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility and agreement of clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries using unaided visual examination and operating microscope.
    Zafersoy-Akarslan Z; Erten H; Uzun O; Semiz M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2009 Jul; 75(6):455. PubMed ID: 19627655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of magnification in a preventive approach to caries detection.
    Forgie AH; Pine CM; Pitts NB
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11887530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Rekha GS; Chandrasekhar R; Vinay C; Uloopi KS; RojaRamya KS; Chaitanya P
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Sep; 16(Suppl 2):138-141. PubMed ID: 38078031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of two visual scoring systems in detecting and assessing activity status of occlusal caries in primary teeth.
    Braga MM; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Imparato JC; Ricketts DN; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 20530964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student versus faculty performance using a new visual criteria for the detection of caries on occlusal surfaces: an in vitro examination with histological validation.
    Zandona AG; Al-Shiha S; Eggertsson H; Eckert G
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 19830976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of Nyvad's system and ICDAS-II with Lesion Activity Assessment for evaluation of severity and activity of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Braga MM; Mendes FM; Martignon S; Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 19776572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the ICDAS e-learning program for occlusal caries detection on dental students.
    Diniz MB; Lima LM; Santos-Pinto L; Eckert GJ; Zandoná AG; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Aug; 74(8):862-8. PubMed ID: 20679455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro.
    Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Diniz MB; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 18663299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The assessment of unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope for the detection of occlusal caries lesions.
    Erten H; Uçtasli MB; Akarslan ZZ; Uzun O; Baspinar E
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 15853104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different time intervals between examinations on the reproducibility of ICDAS-II for occlusal caries.
    Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Weber K; Ziomek O; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Schipper HM; Stoll R; Pieper K
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 20516687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A
    J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection.
    Diniz MB; Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Cordeiro Rde C; Lussi A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 37(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 19681984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Magnifying Loupes on Interexaminer Agreement in the Detection of Noncavitated Occlusal Carious Lesions.
    Khalaf ME; Qudeimat M; Alomari QD; Al-Tarakmeh Y; Honkala E
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(4):375-380. PubMed ID: 30175336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) in epidemiological surveys and comparability with standard World Health Organization criteria.
    Braga MM; Oliveira LB; Bonini GA; Bönecker M; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 19439944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility and diagnostic outcomes of two visual-tactile criteria used by dentists to assess caries lesion activity: a cross-over study.
    Tikhonova SM; Feine JS; Pustavoitava NN; Allison PJ
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 24335157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of visual and image-based ICDAS criteria compared with a micro-CT gold standard for caries detection on occlusal surfaces.
    Carvalho RN; Letieri ADS; Vieira TI; Santos TMPD; Lopes RT; Neves AA; Pomarico L
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Jul; 32():e60. PubMed ID: 29995065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.