These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2232772)

  • 1. Differential learning of phonological oppositions.
    Gierut JA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Sep; 33(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 2232772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the therapeutic progress of children with phonological disorders after the application of the Multiple Oppositions Approach.
    Ceron MI; Keske-Soares M
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 22460379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An alternating treatment comparison of minimal and maximal opposition sound selection in Turkish phonological disorders.
    Topbaş S; Unal O
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Aug; 24(8):646-68. PubMed ID: 20635862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children.
    Powell TW; Elbert M; Dinnsen DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1318-28. PubMed ID: 1787714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological changes obtained in the treatment of subjects comparing different therapy models.
    Ceron MI; Keske-Soares M; Freitas GP; Gubiani MB
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 21271115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation.
    Barlow JA; Gierut JA
    Semin Speech Lang; 2002 Feb; 23(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 11938491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low intensity phonological awareness training in a preschool classroom for children with communication impairments.
    Laing SP; Espeland W
    J Commun Disord; 2005; 38(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 15475014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intelligibility as a clinical outcome measure following intervention with children with phonologically based speech-sound disorders.
    Lousada M; Jesus LM; Hall A; Joffe V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(5):584-601. PubMed ID: 24861159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical application of two phonologically based treatment procedures.
    Tyler AA; Edwards ML; Saxman JH
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Nov; 52(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 3669634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The treatment with rothics and generalization obtained in two models of phonological therapy.
    Donicht G; Pagliarin KC; Mota HB; Keske-Soares M
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Mar; 23(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 21552736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are oral-motor exercises useful in the treatment of phonological/articulatory disorders?
    Forrest K
    Semin Speech Lang; 2002 Feb; 23(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 11938488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a combined treatment approach for childhood apraxia of speech.
    Iuzzini J; Forrest K
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Jan; 24(4-5):335-45. PubMed ID: 20345262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Generalization based on implicational relations in subjects treated with phonological therapy].
    Mota HB; Bagetti T; Keske-Soares M; Pereira LF
    Pro Fono; 2005; 17(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15835574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Therapeutic efficacy analysis of three contrastive approach phonological models.
    Pagliarin KC; Mota HB; Keske-Soares M
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 20098947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonemic structures of delayed phonological systems.
    Gierut JA; Simmerman CL; Neumann HJ
    J Child Lang; 1994 Jun; 21(2):291-316. PubMed ID: 7929683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological and articulation treatment approaches in Portuguese children with speech and language impairments: a randomized controlled intervention study.
    Lousada M; Jesus LM; Capelas S; Margaça C; Simões D; Valente A; Hall A; Joffe VL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):172-87. PubMed ID: 23472957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning.
    Rvachew S; Nowak M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):610-23. PubMed ID: 11407566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximal opposition approach to phonological treatment.
    Gierut JA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Feb; 54(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 2915530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From phonological therapy to phonological awareness.
    Stackhouse J; Wells B; Pascoe M; Rees R
    Semin Speech Lang; 2002 Feb; 23(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 11938489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative analyses of the effectiveness of three different phonological therapy models].
    Mota HB; Keske-Soares M; Bagetti T; Ceron MI; Filha Md
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17461349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.