243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22328326)
1. Block response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
Magirr D
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 22328326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation.
Coad DS; Ivanova A
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 15706635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
Chang M; Chow SC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization.
Du Y; Wang X; Jack Lee J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jan; 40():15-25. PubMed ID: 25460340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inefficiency of randomization methods that balance on stratum margins and improvements with permuted blocks and a sequential method.
Kaiser LD
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(16):1699-706. PubMed ID: 22437508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential monitoring of randomization tests: stratified randomization.
Zhang Y; Rosenberger WF; Smythe RT
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 17825016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
Lu X; Shan G
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive methods: telling "the rest of the story".
Emerson SS; Fleming TR
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Nov; 20(6):1150-65. PubMed ID: 21058111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential urn designs with elimination for comparing K > or =3 treatments.
Coad DS; Ivanova A
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):1995-2009. PubMed ID: 15803441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical considerations for the next generation of clinical trials.
Wu W; Shi Q; Sargent DJ
Semin Oncol; 2011 Aug; 38(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 21810519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
Xing B; Ganju J
Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical analysis of modified complete randomized designs: applications to chemo-orientation studies.
Pilla RS; Kitska DJ; Loader C
J Exp Biol; 2005 Apr; 208(Pt 7):1267-76. PubMed ID: 15781887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximizing power and minimizing treatment failures in clinical trials.
Rosenberger WF; Huc F
Clin Trials; 2004; 1(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 16281886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
Gu X; Lee JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
