322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22329140)
1. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-performance multi-functional reverse osmosis membranes obtained by carbon nanotube·polyamide nanocomposite.
Inukai S; Cruz-Silva R; Ortiz-Medina J; Morelos-Gomez A; Takeuchi K; Hayashi T; Tanioka A; Araki T; Tejima S; Noguchi T; Terrones M; Endo M
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13562. PubMed ID: 26333385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.
Jin X; Shan J; Wang C; Wei J; Tang CY
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():55-61. PubMed ID: 22640821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Membrane technology applied to acid mine drainage from copper mining.
Ambiado K; Bustos C; Schwarz A; Bórquez R
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):705-715. PubMed ID: 28192364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced partitioning and transport of phenolic micropollutants within polyamide composite membranes.
Drazevic E; Bason S; Kosutic K; Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3377-83. PubMed ID: 22260225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance.
Lind ML; Eumine Suk D; Nguyen TV; Hoek EM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(21):8230-5. PubMed ID: 20942398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online monitoring of N-nitrosodimethylamine rejection as a performance indicator of trace organic chemical removal by reverse osmosis.
Fujioka T; Takeuchi H; Tanaka H; Kodamatani H
Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():80-85. PubMed ID: 29475031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the impacts of membrane type, coating, fouling, chemical properties and water chemistry on reverse osmosis rejection of seven nitrosoalklyamines, including NDMA.
Steinle-Darling E; Zedda M; Plumlee MH; Ridgway HF; Reinhard M
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3959-67. PubMed ID: 17582457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of feed solution chemistry on low pressure reverse osmosis filtration of cesium and strontium.
Ding S; Yang Y; Huang H; Liu H; Hou LA
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Aug; 294():27-34. PubMed ID: 25841084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
