BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22329788)

  • 1. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing.
    Knickerbocker H; Johnson RL; Altarriba J
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(5):784-806. PubMed ID: 25034443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotion, Etmnooi, or Emitoon?--Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading.
    Kissler J; Herbert C
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):464-79. PubMed ID: 23059636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Leuthold H; Sereno SC
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading emotional words within sentences: the impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials.
    Bayer M; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec; 78(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 20854848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006).
    Estes Z; Adelman JS
    Emotion; 2008 Aug; 8(4):441-4; discussion 445-57. PubMed ID: 18729575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye movement correlates of acquired central dyslexia.
    Schattka KI; Radach R; Huber W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2959-73. PubMed ID: 20547168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Palazova M; Mantwill K; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2766-75. PubMed ID: 21684295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework.
    Citron FM; Gray MA; Critchley HD; Weekes BS; Ferstl EC
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56(100):79-89. PubMed ID: 24440410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words.
    Kousta ST; Vinson DP; Vigliocco G
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 19591976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision.
    Pollatsek A; Perea M; Binder KS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1142-58. PubMed ID: 10464947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
    Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):407-33. PubMed ID: 21604914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotion and attention in visual word processing: an ERP study.
    Kissler J; Herbert C; Winkler I; Junghofer M
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 18439739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.
    Gootjes L; Coppens LC; Zwaan RA; Franken IH; Van Strien JW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Mar; 79(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 21156188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.
    Hand CJ; Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1294-313. PubMed ID: 20854004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.