96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22332454)
1. Decision support's new advocates.
Burns J
Manag Care; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 22332454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical transformation and the revenue cycle.
Walters R
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Nov; 56(11):88-90. PubMed ID: 12656036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Five reasons radiologists should embrace clinical decision support for diagnostic imaging.
Allen B
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):533-4. PubMed ID: 24899208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Technomics analysis: a matter of care before cost.
Hughes C
Adm Radiol J; 1997 Nov; 16(11):38-43. PubMed ID: 10178452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In support of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
Sistrom CL;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):630-5; discussion 636-7. PubMed ID: 18442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine system helps physicians order the right tests.
Perform Improv Advis; 2003 Mar; 7(3):40-4. PubMed ID: 12741042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time for guidelines in diagnostic imaging?
Yesuratnam A; Mendelson RM; Bairstow PJ
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Jan; 69(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18293719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Guidelines and decision support help improve image utilization.
Rothschild JM; Khorasani R; Bates DW
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Nov; 22(11):95-7, 99, 101. PubMed ID: 11148970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical decision support criteria: key to managing managed care.
Perlik S
Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(6):27-9. PubMed ID: 10175323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A good choice.
Kiser K
Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):14-6. PubMed ID: 20092163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging studies and cost containment.
Valvassori G
Am J Otol; 1991 Jan; 12(1):preceding p1. PubMed ID: 2012181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulatory Changes ahead for Medical Imaging.
Sferrella SM
Radiol Manage; 2015; 37(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 26571968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Technology acquisition: trends in imaging.
Johnsson J; Anderson HJ; Burke M
Hospitals; 1991 Nov; 65(21):26-30, 32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 1916723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiothoracic imaging guidelines in quality improvement.
Kirsch J; Vargas D
J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Sep; 29(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 25100139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Has Medicare gone too far to control imaging costs?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2011 Aug; 20(8):14-5. PubMed ID: 21887986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of electronic decision support on high-tech diagnostic imaging orders and patients.
Solberg LI; Wei F; Butler JC; Palattao KJ; Vinz CA; Marshall MA
Am J Manag Care; 2010 Feb; 16(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20148614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriateness criteria: the double-edged sword.
Borgstede JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):889-90. PubMed ID: 17411725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inventive approaches curtail imaging costs.
Butcher L
Manag Care; 2009 Aug; 18(8):34-7. PubMed ID: 19731508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization management and noninvasive diagnostic imaging.
Weiner SN; Komarow M
Manag Care Interface; 2005 May; 18(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 15941189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing Clinical Decision Support and Appropriate Use Criteria With Recommendations on Urgency of Care: Implications for Imaging Within Emergency Settings.
Glover M; Prabhakar AM; Yun BJ; White BA; Raja AS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1582-1584. PubMed ID: 31145874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]