These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22332590)

  • 1. Virtual drug screen schema based on multiview similarity integration and ranking aggregation.
    Kang H; Sheng Z; Zhu R; Huang Q; Liu Q; Cao Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22332590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual screening data fusion using both structure- and ligand-based methods.
    Svensson F; Karlén A; Sköld C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 22148635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods.
    Venkatraman V; Pérez-Nueno VI; Mavridis L; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2079-93. PubMed ID: 21090728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
    Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FLEXS: a method for fast flexible ligand superposition.
    Lemmen C; Lengauer T; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 1998 Nov; 41(23):4502-20. PubMed ID: 9804690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
    Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
    Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hit expansion approaches using multiple similarity methods and virtualized query structures.
    Bergner A; Parel SP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23600728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening.
    Zavodszky MI; Rohatgi A; Van Voorst JR; Yan H; Kuhn LA
    J Mol Recognit; 2009; 22(4):280-92. PubMed ID: 19235177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using consensus-shape clustering to identify promiscuous ligands and protein targets and to choose the right query for shape-based virtual screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1233-48. PubMed ID: 21604699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating ligand-based and protein-centric virtual screening of kinase inhibitors using ensembles of multiple protein kinase genes and conformations.
    Dixit A; Verkhivker GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2501-15. PubMed ID: 22992037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods.
    Duan J; Dixon SL; Lowrie JF; Sherman W
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Sep; 29(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20579912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. StructRank: a new approach for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Rathke F; Hansen K; Brefeld U; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 21166393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of the third dimension on text-based similarity searching.
    Hähnke V; Klenner A; Rippmann F; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1618-34. PubMed ID: 21328404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligand prediction from protein sequence and small molecule information using support vector machines and fingerprint descriptors.
    Geppert H; Humrich J; Stumpfe D; Gärtner T; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):767-79. PubMed ID: 19309114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New fragment weighting scheme for the Bayesian inference network in ligand-based virtual screening.
    Abdo A; Salim N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21155550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
    Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitatively integrating molecular structure and bioactivity profile evidence into drug-target relationship analysis.
    Xu T; Zhu R; Liu Q; Cao Z
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():75. PubMed ID: 22559876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.