These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22332841)

  • 1. Ethical review from the inside: repertoires of evaluation in Research Ethics Committee meetings.
    de Jong JP; van Zwieten MC; Willems DL
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 Sep; 34(7):1039-52. PubMed ID: 22332841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
    Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of biobank constitution and use: multicentre analysis in France and propositions for formalising the activities of research ethics committees.
    de Montgolfier S; Moutel G; Duchange N; Callies I; Sharara L; Beaumont C; Feingold J; Hervé C
    Eur J Med Genet; 2006; 49(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16530713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limphattharacharoen C; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Pengsaa K; Wilairatana P; Kaewkungwal J
    Malar J; 2015 Sep; 14():342. PubMed ID: 26370243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
    NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decisions by Finnish Medical Research Ethics Committees: A Nationwide Study of Process and Outcomes.
    Hemminki E; Virtanen JI; Regushevskaya E
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Oct; 10(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 26333684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Case-Study of the Resources and Functioning of Two Research Ethics Committees in Western India.
    Chenneville T; Menezes L; Kosambiya J; Baxi R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Dec; 11(5):387-396. PubMed ID: 26994735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lay REC members: patient or public?
    Staley K
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Dec; 39(12):780-2. PubMed ID: 23536688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should research ethics committees meet in public?
    Sheehan M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):631-5. PubMed ID: 18667656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence of IRB/REC Members in Their Assessments of Human Research Risk: A Study of IRB/REC Decision Making in Action.
    Grinnell F; Sadler JZ; McNamara V; Senetar K; Reisch J
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Jul; 12(3):140-149. PubMed ID: 28558484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region.
    Kirigia JM; Wambebe C; Baba-Moussa A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 6():E10. PubMed ID: 16242014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Written work: the social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters.
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell E; Ashcroft RE; Bryman A
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Aug; 65(4):792-802. PubMed ID: 17490795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics board members use?
    Meslin EM; Lavery JV; Sutherland HJ; Till JE
    IRB; 1994; 16(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 11654136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
    Beyleveld D
    Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.