These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22332973)

  • 41. External validation of structure-biodegradation relationship (SBR) models for predicting the biodegradability of xenobiotics.
    Devillers J; Pandard P; Richard B
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):979-93. PubMed ID: 24313438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Decision trees versus support vector machine for classification of androgen receptor ligands.
    Panaye A; Doucet JP; Devillers J; Marchand-Geneste N; Porcher JM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):129-51. PubMed ID: 18311640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessing the validity of QSARs for ready biodegradability of chemicals: an applicability domain perspective.
    Sahigara F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2014; 10(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 24724897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. AllerTOP v.2--a server for in silico prediction of allergens.
    Dimitrov I; Bangov I; Flower DR; Doytchinova I
    J Mol Model; 2014 Jun; 20(6):2278. PubMed ID: 24878803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In silico classification of human maximum recommended daily dose based on modified random forest and substructure fingerprint.
    Cao DS; Hu QN; Xu QS; Yang YN; Zhao JC; Lu HM; Zhang LX; Liang YZ
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Apr; 692(1-2):50-6. PubMed ID: 21501711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prediction of drug-induced eosinophilia adverse effect by using SVM and naïve Bayesian approaches.
    Zhang H; Yu P; Xiang ML; Li XB; Kong WB; Ma JY; Wang JL; Zhang JP; Zhang J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Mar; 54(2-3):361-9. PubMed ID: 26044554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Metabolic biotransformation half-lives in fish: QSAR modeling and consensus analysis.
    Papa E; van der Wal L; Arnot JA; Gramatica P
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():1040-6. PubMed ID: 24239825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using information from historical high-throughput screens to predict active compounds.
    Riniker S; Wang Y; Jenkins JL; Landrum GA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1880-91. PubMed ID: 24933016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting antitrichomonal activity: a computational screening using atom-based bilinear indices and experimental proofs.
    Marrero-Ponce Y; Meneses-Marcel A; Castillo-Garit JA; Machado-Tugores Y; Escario JA; Barrio AG; Pereira DM; Nogal-Ruiz JJ; Arán VJ; Martínez-Fernández AR; Torrens F; Rotondo R; Ibarra-Velarde F; Alvarado YJ
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(19):6502-24. PubMed ID: 16875830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of ready biodegradation estimation methods for fragrance materials.
    Boethling R
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():60-67. PubMed ID: 25119791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Acute Toxicity-Supported Chronic Toxicity Prediction: A k-Nearest Neighbor Coupled Read-Across Strategy.
    Chavan S; Friedman R; Nicholls IA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 May; 16(5):11659-77. PubMed ID: 26006240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biodegradation of chemicals in a standardized test and in environmental conditions.
    Ahtiainen J; Aalto M; Pessala P
    Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 12615106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Support vector machine based classification of 3-dimensional protein physicochemical environments for automated function annotation.
    Min H; Yu S; Lee T; Yoon S
    Arch Pharm Res; 2010 Sep; 33(9):1451-9. PubMed ID: 20945145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prediction of biodegradation from the atom-type electrotopological state indices.
    Huuskonen J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Oct; 20(10):2152-7. PubMed ID: 11596743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Predicting biodegradation products and pathways: a hybrid knowledge- and machine learning-based approach.
    Wicker J; Fenner K; Ellis L; Wackett L; Kramer S
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):814-21. PubMed ID: 20106820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
    Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ready biodegradability test in seawater: a new methodological approach.
    Courtes R; Bahlaoui A; Rambaud A; Deschamps F; Sunde E; Dutrieux E
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1995 Jul; 31(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 8521779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modeling ready biodegradability of fragrance materials.
    Ceriani L; Papa E; Kovarich S; Boethling R; Gramatica P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Jun; 34(6):1224-31. PubMed ID: 25663647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
    Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.