These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2233372)

  • 21. The effects of noise on computerized electrocardiogram measurements.
    Farrell RM; Rowlandson GI
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S165-73. PubMed ID: 16963064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety of Computer Interpretation of Normal Triage Electrocardiograms.
    Hughes KE; Lewis SM; Katz L; Jones J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 24(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 27519772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Nagoya program.
    Okajima M; Okamoto N; Yokoi M; Iwatsuka T; Ohsawa N
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 2233381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A standard communications protocol for computerized electrocardiography.
    Willems JL; Zywietz C; Rubel P; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; van Bemmel JH
    J Electrocardiol; 1992; 24 Suppl():173-8. PubMed ID: 1552253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The coming of age of computerized ECG processing: can it replace the cardiologist in epidemiological studies and clinical trials?
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11604912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Value of scatter-graphs for the assessment of ECG computer measurement results.
    Morlet D; Rubel P; Willems JL
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 2233390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stability of ECG amplitude measurements in systematic noise tests. Results and recommendations from the CSE project.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():61-7. PubMed ID: 3694103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Delphi method to validate diagnostic knowledge in computerized ECG interpretation.
    Kors JA; Sittig AC; van Bemmel JH
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Jan; 29(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 2407933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual or computer-based measurements: important for interpretation of athletes' ECG.
    Berge HM; Steine K; Andersen TE; Solberg EE; Gjesdal K
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 May; 48(9):761-7. PubMed ID: 24563390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An improved method to evaluate the precision of computer ECG measurement programs.
    Morlet D; Rubel P; Arnaud P; Willems JL
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1988; 22(3-4):199-216. PubMed ID: 3410573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CSE (common standards for quantitative electrocardiography) data testing in Japan.
    Okamoto N; Ohsawa N
    J Electrocardiol; 1988; 21 Suppl():S169-72. PubMed ID: 3063770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Data compression for storage of resting ECGs digitized at 500 samples/second.
    Reddy BR; Christenson DW; Rowlandson GI; Zywietz C; Sheffield T; Brohet C
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 1562827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standard interchange for computerized electrocardiography.
    Willems JL; Rubel P; Zywietz C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1993; 6():185-94. PubMed ID: 10163814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: Benefits and Limitations.
    Schläpfer J; Wellens HJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(9):1183-1192. PubMed ID: 28838369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated J wave detection from digital 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Wang YG; Wu HT; Daubechies I; Li Y; Estes EH; Soliman EZ
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 25464986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methodological principles of T wave alternans analysis: a unified framework.
    Martínez JP; Olmos S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):599-613. PubMed ID: 15825862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated electrocardiogram analysis: the state of the art.
    Bessette F; Nguyen L
    Med Inform (Lond); 1989; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 2657271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardization and validation of medical decision-support systems: the CSE project.
    van Bemmel JH; Willems JL
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):261-2. PubMed ID: 2233371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement.
    Badilini F; Sarapa N
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.