These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22335249)
1. Soft tissue topography and dimensions lateral to single implant-supported restorations. a cross-sectional study. Chang M; Wennström JL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 22335249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. Choquet V; Hermans M; Adriaenssens P; Daelemans P; Tarnow DP; Malevez C J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1364-71. PubMed ID: 11699478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Chang M; Wennström JL; Odman P; Andersson B Clin Oral Implants Res; 1999 Jun; 10(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 10522178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of papilla to crestal bone levels around single tooth implants in immediate or delayed crown protocols. Ryser MR; Block MS; Mercante DE J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1184-95. PubMed ID: 16094589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Kourkouta S; Dedi KD; Paquette DW; Mol A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1375-85. PubMed ID: 19681967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Papilla dimension and soft tissue level after early vs. delayed placement of single-tooth implants: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Schropp L; Isidor F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 25263735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparity in embrasure fill and papilla height between tooth- and implant-borne fixed restorations in the anterior maxilla: a cross-sectional study. Cosyn J; Raes M; Packet M; Cleymaet R; De Bruyn H J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23679860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment outcome and patient satisfaction with two adjacent implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone. Tymstra N; Meijer HJ; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Jun; 30(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 20386788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Astra Tech single-tooth implants: an audit of patient satisfaction and soft tissue form. Palmer RM; Farkondeh N; Palmer PJ; Wilson RF J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jul; 34(7):633-8. PubMed ID: 17555415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single-tooth implants: A systematic review. Roccuzzo M; Roccuzzo A; Ramanuskaite A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29 Suppl 15():50-61. PubMed ID: 29498124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective single-cohort study. Covani U; Canullo L; Toti P; Alfonsi F; Barone A J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e323-32. PubMed ID: 24835414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth. Cosyn J; De Rouck T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19519788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. Belser UC; Grütter L; Vailati F; Bornstein MM; Weber HP; Buser D J Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 19228100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preserving soft tissue after placing implants in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone and a prosthetic template for interim crown fabrication: a prospective study. Bruno V; O'Sullivan D; Badino M; Catapano S J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 24314570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Behaviour of soft tissues healing around single bone-level-implants placed immediately after tooth extraction A 1 year prospective cohort study. Lops D; Romeo E; Chiapasco M; Procopio RM; Oteri G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1206-13. PubMed ID: 22775968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. Cosyn J; Eghbali A; De Bruyn H; Collys K; Cleymaet R; De Rouck T J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 21752044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. Gastaldo JF; Cury PR; Sendyk WR J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1242-6. PubMed ID: 15515340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction following full-flap elevation for early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a 5-year randomized study. Schropp L; Isidor F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):733-43. PubMed ID: 18807572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]